Structured Settlement Investments don't really want to go through the whole 9/11 nonsense loan rates here, but inspired by my general annoyance at the topic, I thought I'd present a little run down of the top Structured Settlement Investments ten
photos conspiracy theorists don't want to deal with (click the photos
to see larger versions). I don't claim that this page somehow proves
the official story loan rates to
be right, nor that it proves conspiracy theories wrong, but it gives
some neat examples of why it's hard to take some of these people
seriously. 1. Flight 77 wreckage (from the landing gear) at the Pentagon. Conspiracy theorists used to argue that no plane Structured Settlement Investments ever
hit the Pentagon, claiming that there was no visible debris at the
site. They seem to have retreated from this claim in the last couple of
years.
2. Debris from the Twin Towers falling onto WTC7. car ownership. Many
conspiracy theorists still believe that fires and debris couldn't have
reached WTC7 (the tall building lower-right) to inflict signifi federal loan consolidation department
cant damage, claiming that WTC7 must have been subjected to a controlled demolition.
3. WTC6 lies in ruins. Conspiracy theorists have also argued that WTC7 couldn't have been federal loan consolidation department
struck by debris since WTC6 - which lies between the twin towers and
WTC7 - "wasn't that damaged". Note that the center has entirely
collapsed. In spite of evidence like this, and reports from fire-fighters,
who used instruments to measure the gradual movement and distortion of
WTC7's structure over several hours up until its collapse, Truthers
still prefer to believe that a controlled demolition occurred.
4 & 5. Fires rage in WTC5 and WTC6. Many
conspiracy theorists refuse to accept that fire could have spread to
WTC7, even though fires clearly raged across much of the WTC complex.
6. Plume from the Flight 93 Crash. As witnesses looked on, Mrs McClatchey took this
shot from her porch. Ever since, conspiracy theorists have harassed
and threatened her, even anonymously posting her phone number and
photos of her home on blogs. They claim that the evidence must be
faked, as it is inconsistent with their theory that a missile brought
down the aircraft. (which would have resulted in fragments of the plane
coming down over a wide area), and have subjected Mrs McClatchey to a
torrent of abuse.
7. A seatbelt from the wreckage of Flight 93. Hundreds of
volunteers spent days and weeks combing the area, collecting wreckage
amounting to virtually the entire plane, now in the possession of the
airline (with the exception of the black boxes which are held by air
safety officials. Some conspiracy theorists believe that all of the
local residents in the area are liars, along with all the airline
workers, local police and emergency services, coronors, and air safety
experts involved in the operation to recover the aircraft, and the
analysis of flight data and materials recovered.
8. Sagging floors in WTC2. As the heat in the towers increase,
steel supports were weakened causing buckling, as evidenced by the
sagging floor visible here. This weakening led to the structural failure
of the building. Conspiracy theorists claim that the buildings should
have survived these structural failures, and believe that thousands of
explosive charges were rigged inside the building, with a control
system to detonate them somehow surviving the impact and fires.
9. Workmen cutting beams in the wreckage. Conspiracy theorists
are for some reason obsessed with the idea that thermite was used in
9/11, in spite of the fact that thermite is used for cutting and
welding, and never in demolitions (indeed, it would be practically
impossible to set it up). They cite neatly cut beams as evidence of
thermite being used, but ignore the fact that beams were neatly cut up
by workmen operating after the collapse.
10. Debris out-paces the collapse of the tower. Many conspiracy
theorists claim that the World Trade Center towers fell equal to (or
ludicrously faster than) free-fall speeds. Many photos clearly show
falling debris out-pacing the collapse of the building, proving that
the structures fell at well below free-fall speeds.
Ultimately this sort of blogging is an exercise in futility. There is
no evidence, no matter how convincing, that will ever be accepted by
the 9/11 "Truth" Movement's hardcore evangelists. The irony is that the
people who claim to be searching for the truth are so willing to ignore
evidence and react angrily to those with conflicting evidence and
testimony.
A bigger irony is that if there is a conspiracy, truthers with their deluge of disinformation are doing more than anyone else to help cover it up.
Source: http://www.dalimunthe.com/2010/03/top-ten-photos-911-conspiracy-nuts-hate.html